Legal Opinion
Shelley v. American Postal Workers Union
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 8, 2011No. Civil Action 11-0677 (BAH)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge.
Three union members, who are appearing as pro se plaintiffs in this case, have significant concerns with a tentative collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”) negotiated on their behalf by their union representatives, and seek additional time before the ratification vote in order to communicate those concerns to fellow union members. On April 6, 2011, the plaintiffs Rich Shelley, James Ozanian and Lance Coles, who are members of the American Postal Workers Union (“APWU”), AFL-CIO, filed motions for a temporary restraining order and a preliminary…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches v. EnglandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Calhoon v. HarveySupreme Court of the United States · 1964
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- W. Watersheds Project v. BernhardtDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2019
- Barry v. United Food and Commercial WorkersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- Fredericks v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Murdock v. American Maritime Officers Union National Executive BoardDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2021
- Power Forward Communities, Inc. v. Citibank, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.