Legal Opinion

Maher v. Strachan Shipping Co.

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided March 12, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-4182PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND REASONS

ARCENEAUX, District Judge.

Before the court is third-party defendant, Interstate/Johnson Lane Corporation’s [“Interstate”] motion to dismiss third-party amended complaint for failure to state a claim. For the reasons that follow, this court denies the motion to dismiss.

I. Background

Plaintiffs, retired employees of defendant Strachan Shipping Company, filed this action seeking equitable relief under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act [“ERISA”] for defendants’ alleged breach of fiduciary duty. 1

On January 6,1993, defendants/third-party plaintiffs filed an amended…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Kim v. FujikawaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. In Re Masters Mates & Pilots Pension Plan And Irap LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  5. Chemung Canal Trust Co. v. Sovran Bank/MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Charters v. John Hancock Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
  2. Cobell v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  3. Duncan v. SantanielloDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
  4. Green v. William Mason & Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
  5. Tittle v. Enron Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API