Legal Opinion

Yommer v. Outdoor Enterprises, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 20, 1998No. CT-97-0034PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John W. Wise, Judge.

Appellant Polaris Industries, L.P. (“Polaris”) is appealing the decision of the Muskingum County Court of Common Pleas that found an all-terrain vehicle (“ATV”) a “motor vehicle” for purposes of Ohio’s Lemon Law. The facts giving rise to this appeal are as follows.

Appellee Willard Yommer purchased a 1994 Polaris 400L 4x4 ATV from Outdoor Enterprises, Inc. on February 15, 1994, for the purchase price of $5,150. Almost immediately, appellee began experiencing problems with the vehicle, including the gear shift, chain drive, steering, the 4-wheel drive, exhaust, and the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brennaman v. R.M.I. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. WaddellOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. TaniguchiOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. WemerOhio Court of Appeals · 1996

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Divernuity Properties, L.L.C. v. Stark Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Estate of Montgomery v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Snyder v. Ohio Real Estate Appraiser Bd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Weckbacher v. Sprintcom, Inc., Unpublished Decision (8-21-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. In re ArmogidaOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API