Legal Opinion

Weckbacher v. Sprintcom, Inc., Unpublished Decision (8-21-2006)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 21, 2006No. 2006 CA 00033UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Appellant SprintCom, Inc. appeals the decision of the Court of Common Pleas, Stark County, which declared that appellant's telecommunications facility was subject to the zoning resolution of Perry Township, Stark County, Ohio. The relevant facts leading to this appeal, which has been assigned to the accelerated docket, are as follows.

{¶ 2} Appellant is a provider of wireless telecommunication services throughout the United States pursuant to a license from the Federal Communications Commission. Appellee Scott Weckbacher is the Perry Township Zoning Inspector.

{¶ 3} In September…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bilyeu v. Motorists Mutual Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State v. ArnoldOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. WemerOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Campanelli v. AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Yommer v. Outdoor Enterprises, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. MasonOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API