Legal Opinion
Cebula v. Royal & SunAlliance Insurance
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 23, 2001No. 3:00CV266PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
MUNLEY, District Judge.
Before the court for disposition is a case where we must determine whether the plaintiffs are entitled to $1,000,000.00 or $600,000.00 in underinsured motorist coverage. 1 The plaintiffs are Frank and Dawn Cebula, (hereinafter “plaintiffs”), and the defendant is Royal & SunAlliance Insurance Co. (hereinafter “defendant”). The parties agreed that both the defendant’s summary judgment motion and the merits of the plaintiffs complaint would be addressed at a non-jury trial. A trial was held on November 22, 2000, addressing the plaintiffs’ declaratory judgment…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Karla J. KNABE, Appellant, v. the BOURY CORP. D/B/A Big Boy East D/B/A Elby’s Big Boy, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. BuffettaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- International Raw Materials, Ltd. v. Stauffer Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Transguard Ins. Co. of America, Inc. v. HincheyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- Smith v. Hartford Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. HeintzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Blood v. Old Guard InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Weilacher v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.