Legal Opinion

Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Heintz

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 19, 2002PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLally-Green, J.

¶ 1 Appellant, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, appeals from the judgment entered on June 15, 2001, in favor of Dr. James Heintz and Marian Heintz (the Heintzes). The trial court entered judgment after denying Appellant’s “Petition to Vacate, Modify, or Correct” an arbitration award. We vacate the judgment and remand for further proceedings.

¶ 2 The factual and procedural history of the case is as follows. On September 15, 1998, Dr. Heintz, an orthopedic surgeon, was riding a bicycle when he was hit head-on by a Ford Explorer. Dr. Heintz suffered severe and permanent injuries.

¶ 3 Dr.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. BuffettaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  2. Lewis v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Salazar v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Johnson v. Concord Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Donnelly v. BauerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Trombetta v. Raymond James Financial Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Erie Insurance Exchange v. LarrimoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Transguard Ins. Co. of America, Inc. v. HincheyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Pantelis v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Racicot v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API