Legal Opinion

Weilacher v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 25, 2013PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

MUSMANNO, J.:

Thomas M. Weilacher and Melissa Wei-lacher (“Melissa”), Husband and Wife (collectively “the Weilachers”), appeal from the trial court’s Order denying their Motion for summary judgment and granting State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company’s (“State Farm”) Motion for summary judgment. We reverse and remand.

The trial court has set forth the stipulations of fact as agreed upon by the parties:

1. [The Weilachers] are the sole named insureds under a policy of automo*979bile insurance with [State Farm], which policy number is 005 0085-F27 (“the mutual policy”).

2. The mutual…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Salazar v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Motorists Insurance Companies v. EmigSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Erie Insurance Exchange v. LarrimoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Brandon v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ewart v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Freeth v. Zurich American InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Selective Ins. Co. of Am. v. NovitskyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Goodville Mutual Cas. Co. v. McNear, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2025
  5. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Davis, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API