Legal Opinion
Walker v. Conant
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided February 15, 1887PublishedCited by 32 opinions
Error to Monroe. (Joslin, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
This case comes before us upon demurrer to the special count in a declaration, which reads as follows:
“For that whereas, heretofore, to wit, on the twenty-fifth day of January, A, D. 1885, the defendant held a certain false, fraudulent, and forged mortgage, purporting to have been given, executed, acknowledged, and delivered to her, before said date, by one Henry H. Van Riper and his wife, Lydia A. Van Riper, upon the south-west quarter of section thirty-two, in town one south, of range ten east, in the county of Wayne and State of Michigan, and which had then been recorded in the register’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brand v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- Eagle Bank of New-Haven v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1823
- Barker v. ParkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1822
- Hathaway v. . Town of CincinnatusNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
3Cited by32 opinions
- Moore v. ShieldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Heywood v. Northern Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Central National Bank v. First & Merchants National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
- Norris v. LetchworthMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
- Johnson Controls, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Jay Industries, Inc., Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.