Legal Opinion
Caskie v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 10, 1936No. Appeal, 127PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Linn,
Assumpsit for money had and received: the cause of action alleged is defendant’s tortious interference with plaintiff’s contract relations with International Railway-Company. The appeal is from an order sustaining a statutoiy demurrer (section 20, Practice Act of 1915, P. L. 483) on the ground that no cause of action is set forth in the amended statement of claim.
After alleging his contract of employment with International Railway Company, performance by him, and the resulting obligation of International Railway Company to pay him for his services, plaintiff avers…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Angle v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Erdman v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Steel v. LevySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Estate of GaffneyPennsylvania Orphans' Court, Cambria County · 1892
- Federal Sugar Refining Co. v. United States Sugar Equalization Board, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1920
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Thompson Coal Co. v. Pike Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Morgan's Home Equipment Corp. v. MartucciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Adler, Barish, Daniels, Levin & Creskoff v. EpsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Weiner v. Bank of King of PrussiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Jacobson & Co. v. International Environment Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.