Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.
Before me in these consolidated cases are cross-motions for summary judgment filed, on the one hand, by plaintiff Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (“SEPTA”), and, on the other hand, by defendant Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (“the PUC”), defendant Township of Lower Merion (“Lower Merion”), and defendant Township of Upper Gwynedd (“Upper Gwynedd”). For the reasons that follow, summary judgment will be granted in favor of SEPTA and the PUC will be permanently enjoined from assessing against SEPTA any costs for construction,…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Council of City of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Wheeling & Lake Erie Railway Company v. Public Utility Commission Of The Commonwealth Of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Raymond Proffitt Foundation v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Reilly Foam Corp. v. Rubbermaid Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
- Weissman v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- City of Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.