Legal Opinion
City of Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 24, 1996PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PELLEGRINI, Judge.
The City of Philadelphia (City) and Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) present cross-appeals of a decision of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) directing the City to incur the costs of performing an inspection, preparing construction plans and reconstructing a bridge and directing Conrail, upon completion, to reimburse the City for 20 percent of the actual cost of the inspection, planning and repairs to the bridge. The bridge carries 41st Street, a City street in West Philadelphia, over railroad tracks used principally for passenger rail service.
In…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- New York v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Howlett Ex Rel. Howlett v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Claflin v. HousemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- United States v. County of AlleghenySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Werner v. Plater-ZyberkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Stone Crushed Partnership v. Kassab Archbold Jackson & O'BrienSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Kiak v. Crown Equipment Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- City of Chester v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.