Alternatives Research & Development Foundation v. Glickman
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HUVELLE, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, a non-profit organization, a private firm and an individual, allege that the defendants, the Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) and the Deputy Administrator for Animal Care, Animal Plant Health Inspection Service, have violated the mandate of the Animal Welfare Act (“AWA”), 7 U.S.C. § 2131, et seq., by promulgating regulations that exclude birds, mice and rats from the definition of “animal” under the Act. Defendants move to dismiss on the grounds that all three plaintiffs lack standing to bring suit. In…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alternative Research & Development Foundation v. VenemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Garcia v. AcostaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Rith v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
- Taylor Whitley v. Clare MaguireDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022