Legal Opinion

Garcia v. Acosta

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 24, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2018-1968Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MIGUEL GARCIA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 18-1968 (RDM) R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”),

8 U.S.C. § 1101

et seq., permits employers to hire temporary foreign workers “to perform agricultural labor or services” in the United States. 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a). To hire a temporary foreign worker under this program—known at the H-2A visa program—an employer must petition the Secretary of Labor “for a certification that [1] there are not…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API