Legal Opinion

State ex rel. West v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1996No. 94-1249PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

Claimant seeks to compel permanent total disability compensation pursuant to State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666. The commission wants its order upheld. For the reasons to follow, we find in favor of the commission.

Gay relief cannot be considered without a preliminary finding that Noll, supra, has not been satisfied. State ex rel. Sebestyen v. Indus. Comm. (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 36, 38, 641 N.E.2d 197, 199. Asserting such noncompliance, claimant objects to the reasoning underlying the commission’s denial — that claimant’s limited academic skills do not preclude…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Gay v. MihmOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Burley v. Coil Packing, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State ex rel. Sebestyen v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Mobley v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State ex rel. Mobley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State Ex Rel. George v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State ex rel. King v. TrimbleOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State ex rel. West v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API