Comeau v. Nash
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Justice.
[11] Appellant, William J. Comeau (Co-meau), challenges the district court's factual findings and legal conclusions to the effect that Comeau breached a fiduciary duty he owed to Kenneth T. McGrath (MeGrath, or Mac). McGrath is deceased and Comeau is one of his heirs. During McGrath's lifetime, Comeau obtained control of McGrath's health care decisions and his financial assets via powers of attorney. Upon McGrath's death, Comeau essentially had possession of all of McGrath's assets via pay-on-death directives, accounts in joint tenancy with right of surviv-orship, and other…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- MULLINNIX LLC v. HKB Royalty TrustWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
- Harber v. JensenWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Life Care Centers of America, Inc. v. DexterWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Double Eagle Petroleum & Mining Corporation v. Questar Exploration & Production CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Parkhurst v. BoykinWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kelly v. McNeelWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
- Rios v. RamageDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020