Legal Opinion

O'Hanion v. Great Northern Railway Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1926No. 5,889PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Callaway

The plaintiff, within the limitations of the statutes, may select any county he chooses for the trial of his action and to this choice the defendant must conform unless he seasonably moves for a change of place of trial. The word “moves” as here employed comprehends the things necessary to be done by the litigant to obtain an order of court directing the change.

A defendant may waive his right to the privilege of the change by omitting to demand the right or by failing to observe the statutory requirements. (Secs. 9097, 9098, B. C. 1921; State ex rel. Williams v. District Court, 56 Mont. 478,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Cook v. PendergastCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  2. State ex rel. Interstate Lumber Co. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1918
  3. People v. Ah SamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Bohn v. BohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Rey v. BarclayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hardenburgh v. HardenburghMontana Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Kujich v. LillieMontana Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Gahagan v. GuglerMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  4. State Ex Rel. McVay v. District Court of Fourth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Stewart v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API