Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 22, 1991No. 1 CA-CV 89-048PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TAYLOR, Judge.

Wayne H. and Betty L. Stewart appeal from summary judgment permitting Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company (Mutual) to rescind three insurance policies because of alleged misrepresentations in policy applications. The primary issues on appeal are whether the applications were fraudulent within the meaning of A.R.S. § 20-1109 and whether factual disputes concerning alleged misrepresentations by the Stew-arts to Mutual’s agents preclude summary judgment. Mutual argued that the Stew-arts failed to disclose Wayne Stewart’s “mental health history”, contending that such failure to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sparks v. Republic National Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Fleitz v. Van WestrienenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  3. Illinois Bankers' Life Assn. v. TheodoreArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Greber v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Friedman v. Prudential Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. James River Insurance v. Hebert Schenk, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Monaco v. HealthPartners of Southern ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  3. Dole Food Co. v. North Carolina Foam Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  4. Bennett v. Appaloosa Horse ClubCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  5. In Re the Appeal in Pima County Mental Health Service Action No. MH-1140-6-93.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1993

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API