Legal Opinion
Bennett v. Appaloosa Horse Club
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided December 6, 2001No. 1 CA-CV 01-0027PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PATTERSON, Judge.
¶ 1 Stephaney Bennett appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of her case against the Appaloosa Horse Club (“ApHC”). The court found that a forum selection clause in the parties’ agreement required all lawsuits by members against the ApHC be filed in the state or federal courts of Latah County, Idaho. For the reasons discussed, we affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶ 2 ApHC is a nonprofit membership organization that is headquartered in Moscow, Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of ApHC is to preserve, improve, and standardize the breed of horses known as the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. ShuteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Dieter M. Hugel, Gulf Coast Marine, Incorporated, and Ocean Marine Indemnity Company v. The Corporation of Lloyd's, a United Kingdom CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- R.A. Argueta, Husband Mary Argueta, Wife Grupo Sal Corporation v. Banco Mexicano, S.A. Francisco Suarez Davila Alonso Cuevas Del VillarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Wheeler v. St. Joseph HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Titan Indemnity Co. v. HoodMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
- Schoneberger v. OelzeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Post v. Belmont Country Club, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
- Adams Reload Co. v. International Profit Associates, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2005
- Russo v. BargerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.