Legal Opinion

Ecliff v. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1887PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Chambers, J.) Case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

The plaintiff brought suit for damages for the negligent killing of her son, a boy 12 years of age. The jury were directed by the court below to find a verdict for the defendant.

The plaintiff’s intestate, and another boy, Edward Deidrich, rode on a freight train of defendant to Delray, waited around there until the train was ready to return to Detroit, and then they climbed upon the freight car next to the engine, with the intention of riding back to the city. They remained on the top of this car some time; but, on account of the sparks flying back upon them from the smoke-stack of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Masser v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  2. Messenger v. DennieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  3. Chicago & Northwestern Ry. Co. v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co v. CrolyIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Payne v. Chicago & Alton RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  3. Cooper v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Knickerbocker v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. ShifletTexas Supreme Court · 1900

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API