Legal Opinion

Logsdon v. Main-Nottingham Investment Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 22, 1956No. 2362PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment entered on a verdict in behalf of plaintiff and against defendant The Main-Nottingham Investment Company, hereinafter called defendant, in the sum of $10,000. Defendant appeals.

The following errors are assigned:

1. Error of the court in overruling motion for directed verdict at the close of the evidence:(a) Plaintiff-appellee failed to sustain the burden of proof as to negligence of defendant as alleged in the amended petition.(b) Plaintiff failed to sustain the burden of proof that the alleged accident occurred in a common hallway provided…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Bello v. ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Johnson v. Wagner Provision Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Globe Indemnity Co. v. SchmittOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Gedra v. Dallmer Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Masters v. New York Central Rd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Timothy Brainard v. American Skandia Life Assurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  2. Master Consolidated Corp. v. BancOhio National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. McCarthy, Lebit, Crystal & Haiman Co. v. First Union Management, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Levin v. NielsenOhio Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Irving Leasing Corp. v. M & H Tire Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API