Legal Opinion

Irving Leasing Corp. v. M & H Tire Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 15, 1984No. 82-CA-73PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeber, J.

This appeal results from a judgment of the Greene County Court of Common Pleas wherein judgment was granted in favor of defendants-appellees, M & H Tire Company (hereinafter “M & H”) et al., and against plaintiff-appellant, Irving Leasing Corporation (hereinafter “Irving”). Irving has appealed this determination to our court.

Irving is a corporation engaged in-the business of financing and leasing personal property. Specifically, Irving purchases equipment and then leases it. Appellee M & H is a corporation which is in the business of selling and retreading tires. Appellee Thomas G. Meehan is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Logsdon v. Main-Nottingham Investment Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. Konicki v. Salvaco, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. PRICE BOILER AND WELDING COMPANY v. GordonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1956
  4. Thomson Spot Welder Co. v. Dickelman Manufacturing Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1921

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Westfield Insurance v. Huls America, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Construction Interior Systems, Inc. v. Marriott Family Restaurants, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  3. U.S. Roofing, Inc. v. Credit Alliance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Traxler v. PPG Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2016
  5. Emlee Equipment Leasing Corp. v. Waterbury Transmission, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API