Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Clayton v. Wilson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 2010No. 81920-3PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSanders, J.

¶1 For a number of years Douglas Wilson sexually abused Andrew Clayton, a young boy hired to help with yard work on properties owned by the Wilsons’ marital community. Clayton eventually notified police of the abuse, which led to Mr. Wilson’s arrest. When Mr. Wilson was released from jail but still awaiting trial, the Wilsons executed a property agreement giving Mary Kay Wilson more than 90 percent of the community assets.

¶2 Clayton filed a tort action against the Wilsons. After a bench trial the King County Superior Court found the marital community liable and awarded damages against Mr.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Franklin County Sheriff's Office v. SellersWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Niece v. Elmview Group HomeWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Niece v. Elmview Group HomeWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. CJC v. Corporation of Catholic BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1999

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. Gregg Roofing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. Clayton v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Ahten v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  4. Ahten v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  5. Keith L. & Kay Burdine Holmquist And Fredrick Kaseburg v. City Of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API