In re the Arbitration between Perl & General Fire & Casualty Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order entered October 22, 1969, denying petitioner’s motion to vacate arbitrator’s award affirmed, with ,$50 costs and disbursements to the respondent. The arbitration was held pursuant to a clause in an insurance policy under which petitioner was the insured. An award was made unfavorable to petitioner. After the award petitioner brought on the instant motion on the ground that the arbitrator should have made certain disclosures. It appears that the arbitrator is an attorney. His practice consists of the representation of insurance companies, though in what particular aspect does not appear,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- In re the Arbitration between Shirley Silk Co. & American Silk Mills, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Rogers v. Schering CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1958
- In re the Arbitration between Knickerbocker Textile Corp. & Sheila-Lynn, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re the Arbitration Between Siegel & LewisNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- St. Paul Insurance Companies v. LusisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
- Foley Co. v. Grindsted Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- Conroy v. Country Wide InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Santana v. Country-Wide InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.