Foley Co. v. Grindsted Products, Inc.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
McFarland, J.:
This is a dispute between plaintiff subcontractor, Foley Company, and defendant general contractor, Niro Atomizer, Inc., concerning the confirmation of an arbitration award by the district court. Defendant Niro appeals from the judgment of the district court confirming and refusing to vacate the arbitration award entered in favor of plaintiff Foley.
Niro entered into a general construction contract with defendant Grindsted Products, Inc. (which is not a party to this appeal), whereby Niro was to construct a chemical processing facility on…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Nordstrom v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
- Swift Industries, Inc., in No. 71-1420 v. Botany Industries, Inc., in No. 71-1421Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- San Luis Obispo Bay Properties, Inc. v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
- R. E. Bean Construction Co. v. Middlebury Associates & Middlebury Developers, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1980
- Chillum-Adelphi Volunteer Fire Department, Inc. v. Button & Goode, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jackson Trak Group, Inc. Ex Rel. Jackson Jordan, Inc. v. Mid States Port AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Hooten Construction Co. v. Borsberry Construction Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
- Alexander v. EverhartCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2000
- City of Lenexa v. C. L. Fairley Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1991
- In re the Arbitration Between Johns Construction Co. & Unified School District No. 210Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.