Legal Opinion
In re the Marriage of Sagner
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 31, 2011No. 64074-7-IPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchindler, J.
¶1 — Rory Sagner appeals denial of her motion to dismiss Karl Sagner’s petition to modify the child support order to provide for postsecondary education support of their daughter. Rory claims the court did not have jurisdiction to modify the child support order because Karl did not comply with the requirements of RCW 4.16.170, the statute that tolls a statute of limitations by timely filing and serving the petition within 90 days of their daughter’s graduation from high school.1 Because the court had con*745tinuing jurisdiction to modify the child support order in this case, and Karl complied…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Whatcom County v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Davis v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Kruse v. HempWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Wagner v. WagnerWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Childers v. ChildersWashington Supreme Court · 1978
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rittmann v. Amazon.com, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
- Johnson v. STATE DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- In re the Marriage of CotaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- State v. Cosgaya-AlvarezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- In re the Marriage of SpruteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.