Legal Opinion

Bender's Floor Covering Co. v. Gardner

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 1989No. 2815PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

This appeal involves a contention that appellants were denied due process when their petition to amend new matter was denied on the day it was filed without the opportunity to present depositions, briefs, or argument in accordance with Pa.R.C.P. § 211. We quash the appeal as the order in question is interlocutory and unappealable at this stage in the proceedings.

The relevant factual and procedural history may be accurately summarized as follows. Appellants, Jeffrey and Theresa Gardner, purchased a newly constructed home in which appellee, Bender’s Floor Covering Co., had…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pugar v. GrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Posternack v. Am. Cas. Co. of ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Piltzer v. Independence Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. French v. United Parcel ServiceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Zarnecki v. ShepegiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Foflygen v. R. ZEMEL, MD (PC)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Grove North America, Division of Kidde Industries, Inc. v. Arrow Lift & Construction Equipment Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Davis Cookie Co., Inc. v. WasleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Carringer v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Coldren v. PetermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API