Legal Opinion

Anderson v. State

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 24, 1982No. 1 CA-CIV 5946PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONTRERAS, Judge.

At issue is the right of an adult who has not been adjudged incompetent but who is involuntarily committed to the Arizona State Hospital (ASH) to refuse, in non-emergency situations, to take psychotropic (anti-psychotic) drugs prescribed for his treatment. We conclude that such drugs can only be administered in strict accordance with the Arizona Mental Health Services Act (MHSA), and that, absent the statutory preconditions, the trial court erred in ordering administration of such drugs to appellant. We therefore reverse and remand.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Appellant is a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. O'Connor v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Mills v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Guardianship of RoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  5. Rubie Rogers, and Cross-Appellants v. Robert Okin, M.D., and Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rivers v. KatzNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Arnold v. Arizona Department of Health ServicesArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Large v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Arizona Cannabis Nurses Ass'n v. Arizona Department of Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  5. In Re Mh2010-002348Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API