Legal Opinion
Foster v. Marshall
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 11, 1930No. 19277PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, C.
This action was instituted by R. N. Marshall in the district court of Carter county to cancel a certain tax deed and quiet title to 90 acres of land which defendants W. O. Foster and W. A. Samples claimed under a tax deed. Three years prior to the commencement of the action, W. C. Foster had obtained a tax deed covering the premises and had transferred an interest therein by a regular conveyance to the defendant W. A. Samples.
The defendants answered, settting up the regularity of the tax deed and tax proceedings. At the trial, we think they established clearly, that, in obtaining the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Davidson v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Hagar v. Reclamation District No. 108Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Packet Co. v. KeokukSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Anderson v. BarrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Parks v. LyonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Drummond v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Adams v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Bradford v. SchmuckerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.