Legal Opinion
Grandison v. Wackenhut Services, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 25, 2007No. Civil Action 07-754 (RMC)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.
Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment, filed by Defendant Wackenhut Services, Inc. Wackenhut argues that several of the causes of action that Plaintiff Travis Grandison raises in his Complaint are preempted by Section 301(a) of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185(a) (“LMRA”). Wackenhut further argues that the Complaint fails to allege facts sufficient to support Mr. Grandison’s intentional infliction of emotional distress and due process claims. Mr. Grandison concedes that his…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Gustave-Schmidt v. ChaoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Beyene v. Washington Hilton LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Bond v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- The CUNEO LAW GROUP, PC v. JosephDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Washington, Jr. v. Alliedbarton Security Services, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Miniter v. Sun Myung MoonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.