Legal Opinion

Walls v. Central Contra Costa Transit Authority

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 3, 2011No. 10-15967PublishedCited by 314 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Plaintiff-Appellant Kerry Walls (“Walls”) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendanb-Appellee Central Contra Costa Transit Authority (“CCCTA”). Walls is a former bus driver for CCCTA. After being terminated on January 27, 2006, Walls was reinstated on March 2, 2006 pursuant to an agreement executed over the course of a grievance process between Walls, his union representative, and CCCTA (“Last Chance Agreement” or “Agreement”). On March 3, 2006, Walls incurred an unexcused absence that violated the attendance requirements of the Agreement. As a result,…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Skelly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by314 opinions

  1. Residents Against Flooding v. Reinvestment Zone Number SeventeenDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2017
  2. Hardesty v. Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
  3. Attorneys Liability Protection Society, Inc. v. Ingaldson Fitzgerald, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. Campos v. Town of PahrumpDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2017
  5. Davis v. LawDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013

309 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API