Legal Opinion
Davis v. Law
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 12, 2013No. CIV. S-12-3107 LKK/ACPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Michael Davis sues defendant Hollins Law, A Professional Corporation, alleging violations of the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-1692p (“FDCPA”) and California’s Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, Cal. Civ.Code §§ 1788-1788.33 (“Rosenthal Act”). The gravamen of plaintiffs complaint is that defendant placed collection calls to his home phone, and left a voicemail message which failed to disclose that the communication was from a debt collector. The parties have cross-moved for summary judgment.
The…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ricci v. DeStefanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Ortiz v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Scarola Malone & Zubatov LLP v. McCarthy, Burgess & WolffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Davis v. Hollins LawDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2014
- Davis v. Midland Funding, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2014
- Nicolaides v. Divine & Serv., Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 2019
- Complot v. Citibank NADistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.