Legal Opinion
Residents Against Flooding v. Reinvestment Zone Number Seventeen
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided May 9, 2017No. C.A. NO. H-16-1458PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MELINDA HARMON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
The above referenced action seeks declaratory and injunctive relief to enjoin the use of arbitrary government action that benefits private commercial interests and developers within Reinvestment Zone Number Seventeen City of Houston, Texas (“TIRZ117”) at the expense of substantial *751harm to hundreds of residential homes in nearby Memorial City neighborhoods, allegedly by Defendants’ knowingly conveying stormwater out of the TIRZ 17 commercial areas into its residential areas, which lack adequate infrastructure to deal with the…
2Cases cited251 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
246 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Brennan Norred et al v. Wrights Manufactured Homes LLC et alDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2025
- Carmona v. The City of BrownsvilleDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2024
- Cocchia v. LendingHome Funding CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2020
- Davis v. El Paso CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2023
- Davis, Jr. v. Guild Mortgage Company, a California CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2020
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.