Legal Opinion
Jorge v. Rumsfeld
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided April 21, 2005No. 04-1772PublishedCited by 171 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Miriam Jorge brought a discrimination suit against her government employer. 1 The district court ruled that Jorge’s cause of action under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634, was time-barred and that her claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e~2(a)(l), was foreclosed because she had not exhausted her administrative remedies. After careful perscru-tation of the briefs and record, we affirm the judgment below.
1. BACKGROUND
This appeal follows a dismissal for failure to state a…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Taylor v. Books a Million, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by171 opinions
- Morales-Cruz v. University of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Haynes v. Level 3 Communications, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Andrew Robinson International, Inc. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Thornton v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Franceschi v. United States Department of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
166 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.