Legal Opinion

Deek Investment, L.P. v. Murray, F.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 3, 2017No. Deek Investment, L.P. v. Murray, F. No. 975 EDA 2016PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

STABILE, J.:

Appellants, Francis W. Murray (“Francis”) and Patricia A. Murray (“Patricia”) (collectively “the Murrays”), appeal pro se from the order entered on February 22, 2016 in the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County, denying their motions to set aside a writ of execution against personal property. The trial court determined that the writ of execution of Appellee, DEEK Investment, L.P. (“DEEK”), was timely entered. Following review, we vacate the February 22, 2016 order and remand.

In a prior appeal to this Court, 1 we summarized the factual background of this case as follows:

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ash v. Continental InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Green Acres Rehabilitation & Nursing Center v. SullivanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. First Union Mortgage Corp. v. FrempongSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Jones v. RudensteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Lange v. BurdSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In re FCA US LLC Monostable Electronic Gearshift LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
  2. Estate of: Simpson, W.Appeal of: Colecchia, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  3. Estate of: Simpson, W.Appeal of: Colecchia, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  4. Amelio, C. v. Nationstar MortgageSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Com. v. Hosler, H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API