Legal Opinion

State v. Chenoweth

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 20, 2003No. 20550-9-IIIPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brown, C.J. —

Ten months after the State filed multiple sex offense charges, and nine months after his formal arraignment, William Doren Chenoweth unsuccessfully moved to dismiss for a speedy trial violation. Under a constructive arraignment analysis, the trial court decided Mr. Chenoweth waived his speedy trial rights. Mr. Che-noweth was then convicted at a stipulated facts trial under an amended information charging a single count of third degree assault with sexual motivation. Mr. Chenoweth appealed the speedy trial decision. Conceding a lack of prejudice, Mr. Chenoweth contends he was not…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. StrikerWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. GreenwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Wiley v. RehakWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Wiley v. RehakWashington Supreme Court · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ChenowethCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  2. State v. LackeyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  3. State v. LackeyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. State v. ChenowethWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. LackeyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API