Legal Opinion

Wiley v. Rehak

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 2001No. 70008-7PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

20 P.3d 404 (2001)

143 Wash.2d 339

Leslie WILEY, Respondent,

v.

Frank REHAK, Dana Rehak, Defendants.

Kevin Prueitt, Petitioner.

No. 70008-7.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued February 1, 2001.

Decided March 29, 2001.

Krilich, La Porte & West, Dennis J. La Porte, Philip I. Brennan, Jr., Tacoma, for Petitioner.

Morse & Bratt, Ben Shafton, Vancouver, for Respondent.

IRELAND, J.

This Court granted review of a Court of Appeals' decision (1) holding that Kevin Prueitt could not amend a notice for trial de novo following mandatory arbitration to add himself as a named party after the time for filing…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital v. Franklin CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. WittenbargerWashington Supreme Court · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. State v. NealWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. NealWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Malted Mousse, Inc. v. SteinmetzWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Malted Mousse, Inc. v. SteinmetzWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Williams v. TilayeWashington Supreme Court · 2012

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API