Legal Opinion
Wiley v. Rehak
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 29, 2001No. 70008-7PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.
This Court granted review of a Court of Appeals’ decision (1) holding that Kevin Prueitt could not amend a notice for trial de novo following mandatory arbitration to add himself as a named party after the time for filing the notice had expired and (2) assessing attorney fees against Kevin Prueitt. The Court of Appeals’ decision is consistent with our case law and should be affirmed.
FACTS
The central facts in this case are undisputed. On September 22, 1995, Leslie Wiley was injured in a two-car collision in Cowlitz County, Washington. On June 9, 1997, she filed suit against Frank Rehak, the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital v. Franklin CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. WittenbargerWashington Supreme Court · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- State v. NealWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. NealWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Malted Mousse, Inc. v. SteinmetzWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Malted Mousse, Inc. v. SteinmetzWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Wiley v. RehakWashington Supreme Court · 2001
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.