State v. Graven
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtFoley, J.
Defendant was found guilty after trial to the court of the crime of criminal activity in drugs, namely possession of amphetamine pills. ORS 167.207. The court suspended the imposition of defendant’s sentence and placed him on probation for three years. Defendant’s appeal is based on the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress the evidence introduced at trial.①
The facts are quite simple: Officer Wilson was in the office of the District Attorney of Harney County, located in the county courthouse, in mid-afternoon on April 3, 1972. While standing by the window and looking out, he observed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nathanson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- State v. IngramOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. DunavantOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. SkinnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
- State v. McManusCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brandin Slate Co. v. BannisterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1947
- State v. MelendyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- State v. SholesIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991