Legal Opinion
Yellow Jacket Gold & Silver Mining Co. v. Holbrook
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 3, 1914No. Civ. No. 1218PublishedCited by 6 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. John E. Richards, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
The action was to recover upon the following instrument, designated in the complaint as “a contract and promissory note”:
“San Francisco, California, March 23, 1911.
“Mr. F. R Lewis,
“San Francisco, California.
“Dear Sir:
“Please pay to the Yellow Jacket Gold and Silver Mining Company, or order, the sum of $1227.86, with interest at seven per cent per annum from April 1, 1908, out of the first money you shall receive on my account from the estate of F. W. Sisson, deceased.
“C. H. Holbrook, Jr.”
“The foregoing order is herewith accepted this 30th day of March, 1911, provided any money is ever…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pastene v. PardiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Locke v. KlunkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Bank of Shasta v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Henke v. Eureka Endowment Ass'n of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Winters v. RushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Estate of LissnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Flint v. GiguiereCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Dysert v. WeaverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- First Nat. Bank of Tucumcari v. LutzNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
- Fierce v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.