Legal Opinion
Fierce v. Reed
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 25, 1930No. Docket No. 4127PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
The plaintiff had judgment against the defendant for the sum of $1077.66, balance alleged to be due for and on account of certain work performed by the plaintiff pursuant to contracts hereinafter referred to. From this judgment the defendant appeals.
The record shows that both the plaintiff and defendant were building contractors, and that the defendant had a contract for the erection of a certain school building; that on or about the twenty-third day of January, 1925, Deatherage & Lyon, manufacturers’ agents, submitted to the defendant Reed a proposal to perform certain work and furnish…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pastene v. PardiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Imperial Valley Land Co. v. Globe Grain & Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Flint v. GiguiereCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Winters v. RushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Yellow Jacket Gold & Silver Mining Co. v. HolbrookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
3Cited by4 opinions
- Williams v. KinseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Louisville Title Insurance v. Surety Title & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Merritt v. SimsIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
- California Standard Finance Corp. v. J. D. Millar Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931