Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Tucumcari v. Lutz

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1923No. 2715PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT.

BRATTON, J.

This action was instituted by the appellee, the First National Bank of Tucumcari, against the appellant, Henry Lutz, to recover upon a promissory note executed by the appellant and payable to the order of the appellee. Judgment was rendered in appellee’s favor for the full amount of the note sued upon, from which this appeal has been perfected.

The first error complained of relates to the action of the trial court in overruling the first ground contained in appellant’s demurrer to the appellee’s first amended complaint. By sucb demurrer the sufficiency of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Boyd v. BeebeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Locke v. KlunkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Bank of Shasta v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Duty v. SprinkleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. First National Bank v. StalloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Albergo v. GigliottiUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Mercer v. MercerMontana Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Parkinson v. DiefenderferMontana Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Askew v. RiceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Poitevin v. Refund Cash Grocery, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API