Legal Opinion
In Re O'Neil
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 18, 1977No. Crim. 9447PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PUGLIA, P. J.
--On March 25, 1970, after having entered a plea of guilty to a charge of violating section 11912 (now § 11379) of the Health and Safety Code, petitioner was found to be a narcotics addict within the meaning of Welfare and Institutions Code section 3051 and was committed to the California Rehabilitation Center (CRC) for treatment.
During the ensuing years, petitioner absconded from CRC supervision for a total of 7 months and 25 days and was declared to be .a “releasee-at-large” for that period of time. The Director of Corrections deducted petitioner’s “at-large” time from…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Plymouth v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Bravo v. CabellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- In Re PearceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re ArafilesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Western Land Office, Inc. v. CervantesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Santa Barbara County Taxpayers Ass'n v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Muffett v. RoysterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- California Golf, L.L.C. v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.