Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Bravo v. Cabell

California Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1974No. Docket Nos. L.A. 30275, 30270PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SULLIVAN, J.

In these separate proceedings in mandamus, each petitioner seeks a writ to compel respondent superior court and its clerk to file, without payment of a filing fee, their pleadings in special proceedings in the superior court which arise out of criminal actions pending against them in the municipal court. Since both cases present a common issue, we consider them together.

Petitioner Adelaida Bravo has been charged by complaint filed in the Municipal Court for the East Los Angeles Judicial District, County of Los Angeles, with battery on a peace officer (Pen. Code, §§ 242,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Maine v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. People v. ShipmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Best v. California Apprenticeship CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. Westfall v. SwoapCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Thomas v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Downen's, Inc. v. City of Hawaiian Gardens Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API