Faythe S. Takahashi and Hideo H. Takahashi v. Loomis Armored Car Service, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal from the district court’s allocation of attorney’s fees between an injured employee, Faythe S. Takahashi, and her employer’s compensation carrier, Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., in connection with the settlement of a third party action under Hawaii Revised Statute (HRS) § 386-8. The carrier contends that the district court improperly calculated the employer’s proportionate share of attorney’s fees. We affirm.
For job-related injuries, Mrs. Takahashi received a workers’ compensation award of $40,906.93, to be paid over an extended period of time. She…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Gee v. Tenneco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Amfac Mortgage Corp. v. Arizona Mall of Tempe, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Schalk v. Michigan Sewer Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- American Timber & Trading Co. v. First National Bank of OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by134 opinions
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Milgard Tempering, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Selas Corporation of America, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- John M. Dimidowich, Dba Micro Image v. Bell & HowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Helfand v. GersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- The Burlington Insurance Company v. Oceanic Design & Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.