Legal Opinion

Darling's v. Ford Motor Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 25, 2003PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

[¶ 1] Darling’s, an automobile dealer/franchisee, appeals from a summary judgment entered in the Superior Court (Penobscot County, Hjelm, J.) in favor of Ford Motor Co., an automobile manufacturer/franchisor. Darling’s complaint seeks to recoup warranty repair reimbursement claims that Ford had previously approved and paid, but charged back to Darling’s after conducting an audit. Darling’s also seeks to permanently enjoin Ford from such action in the future. Darling's contends that the court erred when it construed 10 M.R.S.A. § 1176-A (Supp. 2002) as authorizing audits of warranty claims…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mundy Ex Rel. Pamela v. SimmonsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  2. Great Northern Paper, Inc. v. Penobscot NationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  3. Darling's v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  4. White v. McTeague, Higbee, Case, Cohen, Whitney & Toker, P.A.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
  5. McKeeman v. Cianbro Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Peerless Insurance v. Progressive InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  2. In Re Diana P.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API