Legal Opinion

Cameron v. Oberlin

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 1897No. 2,323PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Steuben Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenley, J.

— This action was brought by appellee to recover damages sustained on account of the spread of fire from the premises of appellants. The complaint is in three paragraphs. The first paragraph alleges that the appellee was the owner of land adjacent to that of appellants and that in July, 1895, said appellants negligently set, out fire on their land and negligently suffered and permitted the fire to spread onto the land of appellee, whereby he was damaged without any fault or negligence upon the part of appellee. The second paragraph of complaint alleges that the appellants on the second day of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Woodman v. Metropolitan RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  2. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. GramesIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Vincennes Water Supply Co. v. WhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. FarverIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Ryan v. CurranIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Engler v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Reilly v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. Winniford v. MacLeodOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Carlton County Farmers Mutual Fire Insurance v. Foley Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  5. North American Dredging Co. v. PughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API