Legal Opinion

Reilly v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 1, 1904PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Woodbury District Court. — Hon. IV. F. Hutchinson, Judge. Action at law for damages on account of personal injury. Verdict directed for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWeavee, J.

The plaintiff, a common laborer, was in the employ of one Brown, an independent contractor, engaged in raising the roadbed and track of the defendant company’s road near Laurens, Iowa. In the performance of this work earth was hauled and scraped from “borrow pits,” and deposited in a continuous pile or dump about three feet high extending along the ends of the ties parallel and near to the track. This being done, the track was lifted, and the earth shoveled under it. The material thus used was somewhat loose and gravelly, and contained more or less stones which were liable to roll down upon…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Humpton v. P. F. Unterkircher & SonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  2. Miller v. Minnesota & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  3. Erickson v. St. Paul & Duluth RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  4. Doyle v. Chicago, St. Paul & Kansas City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1889
  5. Brown v. McLeishSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Salmon v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  2. Denneau v. Indiana & Michigan Electric CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Douglass v. Peck & Lines Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  4. Greenwell v. Meredith CorporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  5. Hull v. Bishop-Stoddard CafeteriaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API