Legal Opinion

Engler v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1905No. 5664PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of tb© superior court, for King county, Hatch, J., entered October 12, 1904, upon granting a nonsuit at the close of plaintiff’s case, in an action for personal injuries sustained by a laborer in a sand pit.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

Action by appellant, Adolph Engler, against the city of Seattle, respondent, to> recover damages for personal injuries sustained. In his amended complaint, appellant alleged: That on September 14, 1901, respondent entered into a written contract with T. Eyan & Company, a copartnership, by the terms of which said Eyan & Company were to construct a cement sidewalk and certain other improvements, on Second avenue, in said city; that two certain general stipulations, contained in the specifications attached -to said contract and made a part thereof, provided as follows:

“Plans and superintendence…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Erickson v. St. Paul & Duluth RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  2. Corbin v. American MillsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1858
  3. City of Cincinnati v. StoneOhio Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Reilly v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  5. Cooper v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Epperly v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Tauscher v. Puget Sound Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1981
  3. E. L. Jones Construction Co. v. NolandArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Salmon v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  5. D'Amico v. ConguistaWashington Supreme Court · 1946

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API