State v. James
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ECKERSTROM, Chief Judge:
¶ 1 Following a jury trial, appellant Terry James was convicted of child molestation and sexual conduct with a minor under the age of twelve. The trial court imposed enhanced, consecutive sentences of twenty-one years and life with the possibility of release after thirty-five years, respectively.1 On appeal, James primarily challenges the admission of other-act evidence pursuant to Rule 404(c), Ariz. R. Evid. We affinn for the reasons that follow.
Factual and Procedural Background
¶ 2 We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions. See…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. MoodyArizona Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. RobinsonArizona Supreme Court · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- James 306791 v. ShinnDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023
- James 306791 v. ShinnDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023
- State v. EarlCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
- State v. Hon labianca/pedroCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2022
- State v. Ramos-RamirezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018