Sprint Spectrum L.P. v. Zoning Hearing Board of Willistown Township
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
DALZELL, District Judge.
Before us are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment that involve the interplay of federal and state interests in the rapidly expanding field of cellular phone technology. For the reasons that follow, we will grant in part and deny in part both motions and will remand to the defendant Board of Supervisors for further proceedings.
I. Facts
The parties agree on the basic facts. In August of 1997, plaintiff Sprint Spectrum L.P. (“Sprint”) leased space at 5492 West Chester Pike in Willistown Township, Chester County, in order to construct a personal…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Reno v. American Civil Liberties UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- American Textile Manufacturers Institute, Inc. v. DonovanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- American Cellular Network Co., LLC v. Upper Dublin TownshipDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
- American Tower, L.P. v. City of GrantCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- American Tower, L.P. v. City of GrantCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000